Viral recording sparks ‘syndicate’ allegations over sand, soil dumpers in Assam’s Mayong

Allegations of an organised system to regulate the movement of dumpers and trucks carrying sand and soil have surfaced in Assam’s Mayong area of Morigaon district, with claims that vehicle owners are being asked to pay monthly amounts to operate.

According to the allegations, owners of sand- and soil-carrying vehicles are being asked to pay between Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000 per vehicle every month.

A purported phone recording circulating on social media has also raised questions over the alleged system. The recording reportedly features a person identified as Sunti Kalita, who allegedly communicates with vehicle owners regarding when their vehicles can operate and the timings during which they can ply.

The allegations further claim that vehicle owners are informed in advance about possible Forest Department raids or vehicle seizures.

The purported recording also contains allegations concerning an individual toll gate in Mayong and claims that Kalita acts as an intermediary in the collection of money from vehicle owners. It further alleges that a portion of the money reaches Forest Department officials.

There are also allegations that vehicles whose owners fail to make the alleged monthly payments are targeted for seizure.

The claims have prompted questions over the role of Kalita, who, according to the allegations, does not hold any official government position but is allegedly involved in regulating the movement of dumpers and trucks in the area.

Questions have also been raised over the alleged involvement of Forest Department officials, including Nagaon Divisional Forest Officer Subhash Kadam and Ranger Munni Gogoi.

The allegations come amid claims that more than 200 dumpers operate in Mayong daily. Residents have sought clarity on who collects the alleged payments, where the money goes and whether any government officials are involved in the system.

The allegations have also prompted calls for an investigation to establish the authenticity of the viral recording, verify the claims of monthly collections and determine whether any illegal activity or official misconduct has taken place.

The Forest Department’s response to the allegations was not available at the time of publication.