The Supreme Court on Thursday, 8th October announced that no accused in a sexual harassment case would be entitled to access a woman complainant’s statement which will be recorded by a magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code till the trial court takes cognizance of the Chargesheet.
The decision came after along discussion involving former minister Swami Chinmayanand, who had been MoS home in the Vajpayee government.
The bench included Justice U U Lalit, Justice Vineet Saran and Justice S Ravindra Bhat disapproved of an Allahabad HC decision to to give a copy of a girl’s statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC to Chinmayanand, accused of sexual harassment by the complainant, who was a student in a Shahjahanpur law college managed by the ashram run by the former minister.
The Apex Court said, “The filing of the chargesheet by itself does not entitle an accused to copies of any of the relevant documents, including statement under Section 164 of the Code. No person is entitled to a copy of statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code till the appropriate orders are passed by the court after the chargesheet is filed.”
The SC had ordered, “We are not expressing any opinion regarding the grievances expressed by the girl Miss A and apprehensions of her parents. All that we wish to point out is that the correctness of the grievances/apprehension has to be addressed as per the procedure established in law. In view of above, we direct the chief secretary, Uttar Pradesh, to constitute a special team headed by a police officer in the rank of the inspector general of police to be assisted by the superintendent of police and a team of police officers to enquire into the grievances expressed by Miss A and insofar as the apprehension expressed by the parents of Miss A.”
The SC had also asked the SIT so constituted to investigate the FIR lodged by Chinmayanand about alleged blackmail and demand of extortion money and had requested the chief justice of Allahabad HC to monitor the investigations. The chargesheet was filed after investigations and immediately the accused moved the court for supply of a copy of the Section 164 CrPC statement of the woman complainant, which was given by the HC to the accused.
The woman had filed a petition challenging the decision of the HC. The Justice Lalit-led bench said there was a clear enunciation of procedure by the SC mandating that a witness’s statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC would be handed over to the investigating officer with strict direction not to divulge it to anyone prior to filing of chargesheet.
Readers like you make Inside Northeast’s work possible
To support our brand of fearless and investigative journalism, support us HERE.
The Inside Northeast app HERE for News, Views, and Reviews from Northeast India.
Do keep following us for news on-the-go. We deliver the Northeast.
Copyright©2023 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights: Syndications Today