The Supreme Court on Thursday referred Sabarimala issue to a larger bench of seven-members, after hearing the petition seeking review of its 2018 judgment allowing entry of women in the temple. However, no stay on women entering the shrine has been ordered so far.
In September 2018, the Supreme Court held that a centuries-old ban on women and girls, aged 10 to 50, was illegal and constitutional.
ALSO READ: Meghalaya Government Proposes ‘Garo Exchange Programme’ to Unite Community
As many as 65 petitions, including 56 review petitions were taken into account to give the judgment today.
The decision to send the case to a bigger bench was a 3:2 majority ruling as Justices RF Nariman and DY Chandrachud dissented.
The bench in its judgment said petitions had “sought to revive the debate about what's the religion and essential religious practices”. “Individual right to pray at the temple cannot be superior to what is considered as religious by another sect is what petitions have argued,” the court said.
ALSO READ: Assam Minister’s Security Officer Killed in Karbi Anglong Road Mishap
The last year’s verdict led to a massive protest across the state and protesters thwarted most attempts by women to travel to the Sabarimala temple.
However, in January 2019, two women, Kanakadurga and Bindu, made history by entering the temple.
Support Inside Northeast (InsideNE), an independent media platform that focuses on Citizen-centric stories from Northeast India that are surprising, inspiring, cinematic and emotionally relevant.
Readers like you make Inside Northeast’s work possible.
To support our brand of fearless and investigative journalism, support us HERE.
Download:
The Inside Northeast app HERE for News, Views, and Reviews from Northeast India.
Do keep following us for news on-the-go. We deliver the Northeast
Copyright©2024 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights: Syndications Today