In a significant development concerning the prosecution of Indrani Mukerjea, advocate Ranjeet Sangle has raised serious doubts about the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) handling of key evidence. Representing Mukerjea, Sangle criticized the agency, stating that the alleged mishandling constitutes a major setback for the prosecution's case.
Sangle emphasized the gravity of the situation, describing the lapses as potentially catastrophic for the CBI's credibility. He pointed out that such errors, likening them to a "lunar crater," could severely undermine the prosecution's narrative. Expressing concern over the integrity of the investigation, Sangle questioned whether this incident could be indicative of internal discrepancies within the CBI.
Highlighting the meticulous reputation of the CBI as a premier investigative agency under the central government, Sangle underscored his apprehension that the authenticity of the evidence might have been compromised. He suggested that no CBI officers had physically verified the contested articles, raising doubts about their veracity and the procedural integrity of the investigation.
The advocate indicated that Mukerjea's defense team would exploit any legal advantage arising from these lapses. He implied that the potential legal ramifications could significantly influence the course of the case, potentially benefitting Mukerjea's defense.
This development adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing legal proceedings involving Indrani Mukerjea, known for her involvement in high-profile cases.
Also read: Manipur civil society demands resignation of security adviser, DGP following violence in Jiribam
Copyright©2025 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights: Syndications Today